Friday, September 25, 2009

Etuveed shredded carrots

This happens to be one of the most perfect vegetable side dishes you could ever prepare, and it comes, as might be expected, from our friend Madeleine Kamman's New Making of a Cook. It's called "Etuveed shredded carrots," and while the hand grating of one and a half pounds, six to eight carrots to start with might be a bit tedious, it does turn out to be well worth it. Besides, possibly you own a food mill, which will make the job easier.

Peel and grate, roughly, the carrots. Then, melt about 3 or 4 Tbsp olive oil in a heavy bottomed pan, and when it is hot, add a chopped onion. Cook the onion slowly and gently, until it becomes soft and smells delicious. A little browning of its edges will do no harm.



Dump in the carrots. Stir them and salt them lightly to extract some water from them -- vegetables that are "etuveed" steam mostly in their own juices.



Cover the pot with a lid, and then add a little nutmeg (1/4 tsp), lemon juice (about 1 Tbsp), butter (think generously -- 2 to 4 Tbsp), and a splash of white wine -- perhaps 1/4 cup at most. Cover and cook all this gently for about 20 minutes, until the carrots have absorbed all the seasonings, wine, and butter, and are soft and delicious. Sprinkle some parsley over them at the last minute.

Any white wine is good for this recipe, but chardonnay seems especially appropriate. Madeleine suggests the wine might be replaced with apple cider, too, which is something I have not tried yet.



You want these carrots, the next time you have a roast chicken or any white meat, including pork, veal, or fish. Trust me (and Madeleine). You want them.

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Managing your online wine cellar

Somebody has to do it.

Wine drinkers who poke around on the Internet are likely to be aware of online wine cellars, where you can log in and type up a list of the bottles you have in your home, record what you opened last night and what you thought of it, prices, and so on. Two of the most familiar sites are CellarTracker and Cork'd. CellarTracker has been around for five years and boasts a database of over one million consumer-generated wine reviews -- everybody recording what they thought of last night's wine -- and a log of ten million bottles. Cork'd, brainchild of two web developers each named Dan who work on an iceberg floating between Massachusetts and Florida (the site says so) was founded in 2006 and bought in May of 2007 by New Jersey based wine wunderkind Gary Vaynerchuk of WineLibrary TV.

Occasionally I have visited CellarTracker in order to look up a particular wine that I have tried, and find out what other people have thought of it. (This is crap, I'll sometimes read, which is a rather unhelpful wine note all around.) CellarTracker's look is so busy, however, that it's discouraging for a start. And when I first logged in to Cork'd, I found that the site kept telling me "no one has reviewed that wine yet -- be the first" when in fact I was trying to be the first. I gave up.

Which brings us to Vinut, a newer on line wine cellar launched in January 2009. Full disclosure: the nice man running Vinut contacted me to say he had stumbled upon my blog (insert woo hoo here) and thought my readers might be interested in the site. I took a look at Vinut, and indeed found I was interested in it. Its look is beautifully clean, for one thing, and for another, this on-line cellar tracker is for you, the individual: you log in and use it as an aide-memoire regarding what you have bought and tasted. That's all. As the nice man wrote in an email to me, he found on investigating the market -- other cellar management websites -- that with many of them "things were getting more 'social,' which I didn't find necessary." Exactly. All you really want, especially if you are a novice wine drinker, is some place to store your notes besides that ratty notebook sitting on your desk which you also use as a scratch paper pad and coffee cup coaster. Let's face it: seeing things elegantly totted up on a computer screen somehow looks more serious and worthy. And fun. It's fun to get a clear picture, a screen shot, of just how many bottles you have tried. Maybe a lot more than you think, which makes you feel serious and worthy. If you want to open your Vinut cellar to genuine friends, people whose email addresses you actually know, you may do so, but this is not the place to meet new wine friends who all agree this is crap. "Everyone for himself," as Joseph puts it.

Navigating Vinut, however, will prove a learning experience immediately, which is certainly a good thing. When you log on to start chronicling your wine drinking experiences, the first thing the site will ask you is the name of the vineyard of the wine you wish to record. Required information. You can't go further without knowing it. For the shopper accustomed to buying wine by those attractive, clever, artistic labels which so many winemakers' marketing departments dream up -- Earthquake or Big Ass or Buy This Crud or whatever -- then you have Woodbridge, Woodbridge, and Woodbridge, or you have the lovely little family owned operations in Meaningful Valley, California, which name their wines Meghan Schuyler after a beloved granddaughter -- for the shopper accustomed to all this, the idea of wine coming from a vineyard is a jolt. Oh. The vineyard. That matters? Well, let's see: in my coffee-stained notebook I have a note about a wine I tasted at Ye Olde Wine Shoppe in December of 2007. My handwriting reads, "Castell del Remei, Spain, Gotim Bru 2005 Costers del Segre." Lord have mercy, I have no idea which of those is the vineyard. Maybe none. I at least understand Spain is the country.

Luckily, Vinut will not kick you off your own cellar steps if you type in the wrong thing, but it is uncanny how much it does know. I put in Costers del Segre and found the name already listed in the drop-down menu for Spain's regions. Ah so. Vinut's forcing the user to think about and remember wine in these terms might just represent the very boost needed to get you over the wall from ignorance to connoisseur-ship, or at least to a wise and cheerful appreciation of what wine is. Vineyard, country, region; then vintage year and producer; finally, cute label identification, if any. Wine as miraculous but understandable product of collaboration between nature and man, not as perplexing, incognita temptress, nor as bottled uniformity to be shunned in astonishment if its price rises above $6.99.

(My actual tasting note for what we at Ye Shoppe called Gotim Bru was "average good red blend, not too dry," which makes me cringe now. Gee, how discerning.)

I like Vinut. If you visit and notice that one or two users' contributions, highlighted on the main page, are in German, there's a reason. Vinut's founder was born in the United States but has lived long enough in Germany to be bilingual. Vinut itself exists in two forms, English and German. "Your browser settings will choose the appropriate language for you," Joseph writes. Uncanny.

Incidentally, enjoy this post from Vinography, three years ago, on "Why community tasting note sites will fail (my emphasis)." Vinography makes an exception for on line cellar management sites like CellarTracker -- or, by extension, Vinut. And Vinography agrees with me on CellarTracker's atrocious look, "what must be one of the most godawful web application interfaces I have ever seen. The thing simply stinks ...."

Uncanny.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Occitanian soup, freely translated (and another entry into my Culinary Hall of Fame)

Madeleine Kamman -- I am tempted to say, the great Madeleine Kamman -- remains my favorite cooking writer. Her New Making of a Cook and When French Women Cook comprise in themselves a complete cooking library, although I admit I prepare very few dishes from the latter; as she says in her introduction, most of its recipes are meant for entertaining and so are too elaborate for everyday. What is great about Madeleine, however, and what is evidenced in both books, is not only that she respects and teaches the science and the whys of cooking, which is always a great help (once you learn why your onions burned or your dough was tacky, you won't repeat mistakes endlessly), but that she has deep family and professional roots in France's and therefore the West's cooking heritage. She prefaces many of the recipes in The New Making of a Cook by saying, this is the authentic way (and why), this is the way I was taught and why, this is the no-shortcuts method which you must know in order to understand, etc. The cynic could argue that any writer on any technical subject is likely to claim that whatever he learned at his grandmother's side is authentic and in danger of being lost by foolish hustle-bustle modern man -- but Madeleine, whose attitude anyway is never lofty and judgmental like that, does seem to know her material. She knows, for example, that if you want to taste something like the fermented fish sauce of ancient Rome called garum or liquamen, "try to find on the French Riviera and in the backcountry of Nice a true pissalat, which by now has become a rare form of true liquamen."

Well, okay. Needless to say, I'll trust her on things like mashed potatoes or a good roast chicken.

Today's recipe is from the "Happy Marriages" chapter -- i.e., soups -- of The New Making of a Cook. I have had to translate Occitanian Soup into a somewhat less robust version of the original, not having access to confit fat, walnut oil, or pancetta. Not that it's anyone's fault but my own that I don't have access to these things. Confit fat, for example, is a kitchen product that you understand perfectly well you could make yourself, once you carefully read Madeleine's instructions about it. It's simply any animal fat, but usually duck, that is used as a kind of deep bath in which to cook a salted and spiced meat. Then the meat and fat are cooled and stored in a jar until wanted, the fat of course solidifying on top of the meat to act as a seal. So for a recipe calling for confit fat, you would reach into your cellar or fridge and spoon out a bit of it from the jar. The whole affair probably represents a cooking technique dating from the Stone Age, Madeleine says, "when meats were cooked in water in a large animal skin stretched like a pouch over an open fire. ...when one cooks meat this way and lets it simmer a long time, the water eventually evaporates, leaving the meat to finish cooking in its own fat." Incidentally, the spice mixture she likes best, to sprinkle on the meat you intend to cook in confit, comes from the village of Beynac in the Perigord (see page 786).

Need I elucidate why she takes pride of place in my little Culinary Hall of Fame?

But, the soup. In the very authentic version, you will start by soaking dried beans overnight in water. Then you'll cook them briefly and set them aside. Then, you'll brown pancetta and onions in confit fat, and add to them loads of chopped vegetables -- cabbage, leeks, carrots, turnips, and celery, plus a big bouquet garni of 20 parsley stems, 1 large bay leaf, and 1 "very large" sprig of thyme. Toss all of it and let it cook briefly, then cover the vegetables with water and cook about 15 minutes, then add the beans and their water and cook about 35 more minutes.

Meanwhile -- authentically, again -- you'll prepare, first, a persillade. This is a combination of 3 large cloves of garlic, diced, along with 1/4 cup of minced fresh parsley. Once this is ready in a little bowl, add half of it to a sausage mixture of ground turkey, goose, or duck meat plus Italian sausage removed from its casing, plus an egg and a cup of breadcrumbs. All of this mixture you will shape into six patties, which you'll then wrap in blanched, softened cabbage leaves. Tie these packages with kitchen string, and drop them into the soup to cook. They will be done after about 40 minutes' simmering. The right amounts of salt and pepper, of course, are for you to judge all through your cooking.

Finally, to serve, you will remove the string from the meat packages, and stir into the soup the other half of that persillade sitting in the little bowl. And you'll have a grated hard cheese handy to sprinkle on each individual portion. "A dry sheep's milk cheese from the French or Spanish Pyrenees" would be best, or a Pecorino Romano. (I used a Parmesan.)

May I, respectfully, translate? I think it's all right if I do. Somewhere in the 1100 page depth of her book Madeleine writes that over the years, she has learned to appreciate and accept the simple reality of other people's tastes.



Melt a nice-flavored combination of fats in a heavy bottomed pot. Butter and olive oil are excellent. Add and stir, soften and wilt, some chopped onions, leeks, carrots, celery, and Savoy cabbage. (This last, and the leeks, make a real difference.)

Stir in some herbs, like parsley, thyme, and basil. Fresh thyme is one of your very best friends in the soup pot.

Add water to cover the vegetables. I like to add a packet of peppercorns and coriander seeds stapled into a paper coffee filter, which substitutes well for the cheesecloth you don't necessarily need to buy.



Simmer the soup as long as you like. Apart from the preparation of the beans, even Madeleine's authentic version only really cooks for perhaps an hour or an hour and fifteen minutes, counting the forty minutes the sausage and cabbage packages will "finish cooking with the soup." The longer the better, however.



Do, by all means, make that persillade and stir half of it into the soup at the end. I think it's considered acceptable to moisten it with a bit of olive oil, too. If it doesn't give you a new and lifelong passion for fresh garlic, it will at least keep Dracula away for the night.

And about the sausage and cabbage packages. I believe there's no harm in making meatballs instead. A pound of ground beef or veal, mixed with half the persillade and the egg and breadcrumbs, may be formed into small balls and the balls simmered 15 minutes in a separate pot of salted water. Add these to the soup -- no strings attached -- and carry on.



When you sit down to dine you will almost, almost feel you are somewhere in the Perigord, which incidentally is just where those French boys found the Stone Age cave paintings in Lascaux in the 1940s. Perhaps our ancestors then -- to be fair, Frenchmen's ancestors, wouldn't you know it -- painted so beautifully because they had just eaten so well. Confits, and things.

Madeleine must have the last word. This is one of the wisest things I think I have ever read: and it's in a cookbook.

"There is something instructive to be found everywhere and the more points of view you allow yourself to understand, the more you will become truly yourself by keeping what you like and discarding what you do not."

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Alexander Valley cabernet sauvignon, 1979

Ought one to store one's wine upright in the back of a liquor cabinet for thirty years? Hmmm. Well, surely they'll make more.



What's interesting is that, according to Alexander Valley's website, the winery was built in 1975, so this vintage may have been the very first and certainly had to have been among the first.



In thirty years, the wine had done what good wines are supposed to do when they age: all its mouth-puckering tannins were gone, its color had altered from mulberry youth to nut-brown age, and its taste was all sherry, pecans, and baked date syrup, if there could be such a thing. This cabernet probably reached its prime ten years ago, for it certainly did not thrill the party enough to finish the bottle -- and when it comes to it, people drink up what they like.

But it was fun to bring to a Wine 101 tasting the following week, so that everyone could literally hold up to the light and see two examples of the same type of wine, made thirty years apart. Some actually gasped as they watched the brown liquid pour into the cup. But it didn't get drunk up that night, either.

So I still have half the bottle. May I cook with it, or will it ruin any dish?

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Wine news: the harvest begins

It seems 2009 will be a year to savor both for bordeaux and burgundies. The summer weather was near-perfect in both regions, that is, after that hailstorm in Bordeaux in May which wiped out a good portion of the crop. Grapes are small and intensely flavored, and should therefore produce wines of concentration and "structure" -- wines that have enough tannins and acids in them to give them interest in the mouth and age-worthiness in the bottle. (For an idea of what you're missing in this way, try a nice jug wine, as I did recently. It tasted exactly like pink water.) Decanter magazine quotes wine makers in both areas as comparing the 2009 vintage to the 2005, itself of legendary quality.

This is the sort of knowledge that wine lovers need before they buy a bottle three years from now, when whatever of the 2009 vintage that has escaped wealthy collectors finds its way to retail shelves. Write yourself a memo, and happy hunting in 2012.

Decanter: Burgundy predicts magnificent 2009
Decanter: Bordeaux: 2009 could be the next 2005

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...